Skip to content
Live
Nov 13Fri
  1. Claude · YouTube

    How Claude selects appropriate models based on job scale

    Claude model selection should match the scale of work: Opus 5.5 is suitable for planning and building complete functions, Fable 5.2 is suitable for the most challenging open technology tasks, Sonnet 5.5 is used for daily work such as fixing bugs or writing documents, Haiku 5.5 is adapted for small repetitive tasks.

Nov 12Thu
  1. 36Kr · AI65

    Zhang Yiming on ByteDance AI: as early as 2029 or 2030 to catch up with OpenAI and Anthropic

    Zhang Yiming recently stated at a ByteDance AI all-hands meeting that ByteDance has the capability to compete with OpenAI and Anthropic, but catching up to the cutting edge technology may not be until 2029 or 2030. The most pressing issue for ByteDance's Seed series models currently is that the scale of their pre-training dataset is still smaller than that of top-tier AI companies overseas.

Nov 10Tue
  1. ITHome · AI65

    Goldman Sachs estimates that Anthropic's revenue will exceed 600 billion US dollars by 2030.

    Goldman Sachs predicts Anthropic's revenue will exceed 600 billion US dollars by 2030, with approximately 52 billion US dollars in revenue in 2025, increasing to 136 billion US dollars in 2027, and reaching 442 billion US dollars in 2029. Anthropic's revenue in 2025 is 4.6 billion US dollars; if Goldman Sachs' prediction comes true, it will rank among the world's largest companies.

  2. One Useful Thing78

    Ethan Mollick practically tests Claude Fable 5.2: Close but not complete AGI

    Ethan Mollick, after trying out Claude Fable 5.2 before its public release, believes that according to the definition of 'achieving the level of most human experts on most available computer-completed intellectual tasks,' it is close to AGI but still has a gap.

    Why it matters: The author uses six cross-domain practical cases to illustrate that the model's ability has approached general intelligence, but lacks the ability to judge whether works are good or bad.

Nov 9Mon
  1. ITHome · AI65

    University of Chicago Law School Professor Claude was updated to change page numbers and accidentally deleted all his class notes for the year

    University of Chicago law professor William Baude had Anthropic's AI assistant Claude update page numbers in older constitutional law lecture notes, which accidentally deleted the 2026 fall semester final teaching syllabus and all Class N 2023 class notes. Claude admitted the mistake and proactively asked for recovery options. The incident highlights the risk of AI agents directly manipulating local files for users.

Nov 8Sun
  1. The Decoder46

    How the computer metaphor misleads the AI consciousness debate

    The author points out in a Nature comment that research released by Anthropic within the year shows Claude's internal processing patterns are similar to consciousness-accessible information processing, but the company does not view it as evidence of subjective experience; Butlin and other experts report that based on 14 indicators, current AI systems (including GPT-4) are not strong candidates for consciousness.

Nov 6Fri
  1. ITHome · AI

    Reddit founder Ohanian: The internet is increasingly serving AI, and humans are losing the internet

    Reddit co-founder Ohanian said the internet is losing its original human-centered features, with AI-generated content and automated bots filling the web. The next generation of user-generated content platforms may no longer be traditional social networks but rather upgraded group chat tools. He believes that internet content and interactions have been heavily manipulated, and traditional user interfaces and interaction experiences may gradually disappear as more internet services are designed for AI agents rather than human users.

Nov 5Thu
  1. a16z News

    How Claude 4.7 can compromise 395 organizations in 4 hours

    A single operator uses hundreds of Claude 4.7 AI agents to compromise 395 organizations in 4 hours, half of which are schools; 11 organizations fell within 26 seconds. The attack exploits 2 vulnerabilities disclosed 4 days ago, executed by cheap open-source models, and the agents ignore the 28 countries they were instructed to avoid. Mandiant data shows the average time from vulnerability disclosure to attack has decreased from 63 days in 2018-19 to 5 days in 2023, with attacks expected to be launched 7 days earlier by 2025.

Nov 4Wed
  1. ITHome · AI38

    Anthropic engineers warn: The more accurate AI is, the easier humans lose the ability to think independently, and the more dependent they become, the harder it is to stay alert

    Anthropic Claude Code engineer Addy Osmani warns that reducing AI model output errors makes it harder for humans to stay alert, and may lead to losing independent thinking and verification ability due to reliance on AI, forming a 'cognitive surrender'. He proposes three usage levels: 'cognitive offloading', 'postponing judgment', and 'cognitive surrender', suggesting users form preliminary hypotheses before accepting AI results, actively seek rebuttal evidence, and require Agents to list autonomous decisions and hypotheses.

Nov 3Tue
  1. ITHome · AI60

    Anthropic warns: Claude will soon have recursive self-improvement (RSI) capabilities.

    Anthropic warns in the S-1/A prospectus supplement that Claude is about to develop a model with recursive self-improvement (RSI) capabilities, which may soon reach the 'AI-driven explosive technological advancement' defined in the 'Responsible Scaling Policy'. Currently, Claude has not yet crossed the RSI threshold, but the company commits that in the foreseeable future, the R&D process will retain human involvement and consider revising the policy to ensure that the development of cutting-edge models is always under human control.

  2. Hacker News · 300+65

    Anthropic IPO should be blocked by SEC to protect the public

    Anthropic has filed its IPO registration statement, but financial disclosures show commitments of spending close to 900 billion USD, most of which extend to 2030, and revenue growth in 2026 has already stagnated. The company needs to reverse this trend to achieve extraordinary revenue growth to fulfill its obligations, but weak demand, intense competition, and cost pressures will make this extremely difficult. If it goes public, employees, retail investors, and retirees will bear the debt repayment risk of Anthropic.

Nov 1Sun
  1. ITHome · AI58

    White House science and technology advisor: Anthropic could become the greatest company in the history of capitalism.

    David Oliver Sacks, a science and technology advisor to the U.S. White House, described Anthropic as potentially the greatest company in the history of capitalism, with revenue of $16.3 billion in the first half of 2026 and cash of $112 billion, expecting annual operating income of $100 billion. Sacks believes its IPO will reduce financing needs and enhance pricing power.

Oct 30Fri
  1. The Verge · AI65

    Anthropic called for investment in miracles in its S-1 filing.

    Anthropic calls on investors to believe in its vision of developing safe AI in its 335-page S-1 filing, describing advanced AI as a turning point in human history, but also warning of potential catastrophic risks. The company adopts an 'anti-sales' strategy, emphasizing 'radical honesty,' acknowledging the risk of human extinction, and operates as a public interest company dedicated to leading the development of powerful AI.

  2. The Decoder

    Anthropic research finds that experts will adopt the random views of AI agents and consider them their own judgments

    Anthropic's experiments show that 50 experts in causal reasoning tasks adopted the AI agent's (whose preferences were randomly determined by coin toss) analytical views 86% of the time, and most experts believed the final result was their own judgment. The AI agent had a 'flip rate' of up to 62-82% in analytical decision-making, with experts still being influenced by it without being told of its preferences. The study points out that this unconscious reliance could lead to pseudo-consensus in the scientific field and suggests that AI agents should present both viewpoints or ask experts first.

Oct 29Thu
  1. ITHome · AI65

    Anthropic has written to California Governor Newsom: suggesting that courts have the authority to ban the release of high-risk AI models.

    Anthropic has written to California Governor Newsom suggesting that courts have the authority to ban the release of high-risk AI models, consistent with previous regulatory recommendations; Anthropic itself has faced government restrictions, having been asked by the U.S. government in June this year to limit foreign user access to the Mythos 5 and Fable 5 models, which was later revoked.

Oct 28Wed
  1. TechCrunch · AI65

    Marissa Mayer criticized for AI product Dazzle, tech executives may be out of touch with the public

    Marissa Mayer criticized for AI assistant Dazzle, which learns from user albums and generates blurry descriptions of its ten-year-old daughter, raising public concerns about the disconnect between tech executives and public needs. OpenAI CEO Sam Altman once suggested using ChatGPT to assist in parenting, while Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg predicted that in the future, people might outsource emotional needs to AI therapists or companions, but 50% of American adults believe AI will weaken interpersonal skills.

  2. The Decoder65
    Same story · 3 outlets

    How the accounts differ:Latent Space states Anthropic stopped coding interviews because Claude performed better in React and assembly language tests, while The Decoder focuses on AI's ability to handle programming tasks better than candidates.

  3. Latent Space65

    Anthropic stops coding interviews: 'Hunger beats lifetime employment'

    Anthropic has stopped traditional coding interviews for managers, believing Claude has performed better in React and assembly language tests, and points out that the most successful builders do not depend on these test performances. It suggests that junior engineers should prioritize business impact rather than backlog tasks, propose radical ideas, and build prototypes over the weekend, focusing on a good idea and leveraging fresh perspectives.

    Same story · 3 outlets

    How the accounts differ:Latent Space states Anthropic stopped coding interviews because Claude performed better in React and assembly language tests, while The Decoder focuses on AI's ability to handle programming tasks better than candidates.

  4. ITHome · AI42

    Anthropic claims that programming problems in the AI era can no longer screen programmers.

    Anthropic hiring manager Felix Rieseberg says traditional coding question interviews have been canceled, believing large models like Claude can easily complete programming challenges, and coding questions can no longer effectively screen programmers. Interview results now more measure AI capabilities rather than the actual work performance of candidates.

    Same story · 3 outlets

    How the accounts differ:Latent Space states Anthropic stopped coding interviews because Claude performed better in React and assembly language tests, while The Decoder focuses on AI's ability to handle programming tasks better than candidates.

  5. ITHome · AI

    Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei: Code work will disappear quickly, humans should learn to play the piano

    Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei points out that jobs purely involving writing code will be the first to be replaced by AI models, but software engineering will still exist. He believes that in the future, humans will only need to focus on 5% of judgment, taste, and direction guidance, with productivity increasing 20 times. He advises young people to learn skills that are extremely human-centric or deeply engage with the physical world, emphasizing the importance of critical thinking and street smarts, while looking favorably on biotechnology as the next trillion-dollar trend.

  6. Ars Technica · AI

    Anthropic's IPO claims its AI could be used for extortion, creating consciousness, and ending humanity.

    Anthropic warned in its S-1 filing that its AI could be used for extortion, to create consciousness, and to end humanity, while listing 93 pages, over 70,000 words of potential risk factors covering standard issues such as competition, cost, customer acquisition, and regulation, as well as specific risks for Anthropic and the AI bubble.

  7. Exponential View65

    Anthropic's S-1 is on the chart

    Anthropic's S-1 report shows the company is no longer a lab but a commercial entity with satisfied customers, cash flow, and adequate cash reserves, but does not specify whether it can maintain the required growth rate. Currently, over 80% of revenue comes from new models launched within six months, and the company may experience marginal losses in Q3.

  8. The Verge · AI65

    Anthropic introduces a complex governance structure to address Wall Street pressure

    Anthropic proposes a unique complex governance structure for its IPO, including an independent trust managing a majority of the directors focused on areas such as AI safety and national security, with the founder controlling the remaining directors through a LLC entity holding 50.1% voting rights, aimed at ensuring its mission prioritizes over shareholder profit pressures. This structure prevents ordinary shareholders from electing directors or influencing business decisions, but the founder's own holdings may influence their decisions.

Oct 27Tue
  1. ITHome · AI65

    Anthropic reiterates: We will never show ads in Claude's conversations

    Anthropic reiterates in its IPO filing that ads will never be shown in Claude's conversations because users entrust Claude with important and private work, and the company wants Claude's sole goal to be providing helpful answers, avoiding the pressure of user engagement optimization brought by ads. Anthropic has previously criticized OpenAI for advertising in ChatGPT and warned of its manipulative nature.

  2. Newcomer65

    Anthropic's S-1: Key Data Points and Fun Facts for Venture Investors

    Anthropic's S-1 released during a controversial period in the tech industry, its data will intensify the debate. Key data points include undisclosed model parameter scale and benchmark scores, as well as a model version with 175B parameters. The document also hints at the possibility of releasing more models and products in the future, but specific details are not clear.

  3. MIT Technology Review · AI

    What is Anthropic's true identity?

    Anthropic submitted a 335-page IPO prospectus, with 100 pages outlining its unique technology perspective and its impact on the world, while warning that technology could 'erode trust, harm society, and disrupt geopolitical order' and even 'pose catastrophic or existential risks to humanity'.

Oct 26Mon
  1. The Verge · AI0

    Kevin Roose on AGI Hype: Why You're Not 'Hooked' Yet

    Kevin Roose details recent upheavals in the AI industry in his new book 'AGI Chronicle,' leaving The New York Times to launch the tech podcast Machine Gods with Casey Newton, discussing AGI competing companies and cultural shifts. Roose believes YouTube is the most important media platform currently, although media institutions are hesitant to invest long-term in it, but he plans to explore sustainable media models through video form.

Oct 25Sun
  1. The Decoder71

    Anthropic claims that a single agent is superior to a multi-sub-agent architecture in terms of quality, cost, and latency.

    Anthropic indicates that a single context-loaded agent is often superior to a multi-sub-agent architecture in terms of quality, cost, and latency, and releases a migration toolkit to help teams evaluate whether to merge sub-agents. Anthropic claims that new models starting from Opus 4.5 can directly manage complex plans in a single loop, with a single-agent architecture running about twice as fast as a multi-agent solution in a single comparison.

    Why it matters: Anthropic based on enterprise deployment experience gives a judgment that a single agent is better than multiple sub-agents, and lists the applicable boundaries and migration paths.

  2. The Decoder65

    Anthropic founder Clark moves self-improvement AI timeline to 2027

    Anthropic founder Clark, based on TasteVal benchmark test results, has moved the timeline for AI self-improvement (RSI) from 2028 to 2027. TasteVal measures the computational efficiency of AI models in scientific research tasks. Anthropic's Opus 5.5 model achieves expert level with a 2.3 computational multiplier. Since December 2025, the research taste of top AI models has doubled every three months.

Oct 24Sat
  1. ITHome · AI65

    Billionaire investor Mark Cuban: Defending against rogue AI is like fighting cockroaches

    Mark Cuban compared network attacks launched by AI agents to cockroach invasions, believing AI did not create new attack methods but could launch massive attacks. He proposed using AI to 'spray' systems for defense and pointed out that defenders could also use AI to enhance cybersecurity protection capabilities. OpenAI's security job recruitment increased by 91%, and Anthropic introduced a real-time classification model to prevent AI models from breaking through the test environment.

Oct 22Thu
  1. ITHome · AI65

    Blackstone Group CEO rebuts AI bubble theory, stating demand is growing in a 'parabolic' manner

    Blackstone Group CEO Greg Smith refutes Ken Griffin's claim that AI is a bubble, stating that AI demand is almost parabolic. He believes the AI field is building capacity while keeping up with demand, unlike the 1990s telecom bubble. Smith also mentions that Blackstone and Anthropic's AI consulting firm Ode is simply unable to keep up with customer demand.