Skip to content
Live
Hugging Face Daily Papers·· 2 days ago

SO-Arena: Benchmarking the Capability Spectrum and Reliability of System One Models

SO-Arena: Benchmarking the Capability Spectrum and Reliability of System One Models

Brief overview

SO-Arena evaluates system one model through 11 domains and 5 capability families, finding differences in scalability and reasoning gain, and high overall accuracy does not guarantee reliable decision-making. This benchmark assesses the capability spectrum through reliable sources and manual verification, domain-specific difficulty standards, and iterative execution of actions in a sandbox; it evaluates decision reliability through decision stability under option set changes and answer identification when there are no valid options. 21 model evaluations show differences in scalability and reasoning gain across domains, and the best system one model ranks only seventh in reliability.

Article

Abstract

SO-Arena evaluates System One models across domains and capability families, revealing that scaling and reasoning gains vary and that high overall accuracy does not ensure reliable decision-making.

System One models promise fast, general-purpose decision-making without lengthy token generation. However, understanding their capability spectrum and decision reliability requires more than aggregate performance on current benchmarks. Existing evaluations often provide limited insight into the breadth of model capabilities and the reliability of their decisions. We introduce SO-Arena, a benchmark characterizing the capability spectrum and decision reliability of System One models across 11 domains and five capability families. For the capability spectrum, SO-Arena offers evidence-grounded evaluation through reliable sources and manual verification of reference labels against model-visible inputs; fine-grained capability assessment through domain-specific difficulty criteria; and realistic interactive evaluation, where models iteratively execute actions in sandboxes. Reasoning-intensive tasks further enable system one-two comparison. Beyond accuracy, SO-Arena assesses decision reliability through two complementary measures: decision stability under controlled option-set changes and missing-answer recognition when no valid option is available. Evaluations across 21 models reveal that the benefits of scaling and additional reasoning vary substantially across domains. More importantly, strong overall performance does not necessarily imply reliable decision-making: the best-performing System One model ranks only seventh in reliability. Together, these findings highlight the need to characterize capability spectrum and decision reliability as complementary dimensions, providing a systematic view of the strengths and limitations of System One models.

View arXiv page View PDF Project page GitHub 9 Add to collection

Get this paper in your agent:

hf papers read 2611.15777

Don't have the latest CLI?

curl -LsSf https://hf.co/cli/install.sh | bash

Models citing this paper 0

No model linking this paper

Cite arxiv.org/abs/2611.15777 in a model README.md to link it from this page.

Datasets citing this paper 1

SO-Arena/SO-Arena

Viewer •

Updated about 2 hours ago

•

1

•

41

•

3

Spaces citing this paper 0

No Space linking this paper

Cite arxiv.org/abs/2611.15777 in a Space README.md to link it from this page.

Collections including this paper 0

No Collection including this paper

Add this paper to a collection to link it from this page.

Source: Hugging Face Daily Papers · huggingface.co