Skip to content
Live
Hugging Face Daily Papers·· 13 days ago

Follow the Gradient: Tracing Safety Degradation Back to Training Data

Follow the Gradient: Tracing Safety Degradation Back to Training Data

Brief overview

SimpleLoRIF identifies and filters instruction data that silently erodes LLM safety through gradient alignment, generating the SafeTulu dataset that reduces adversarial success rate by 22% while preserving model capabilities.

Article

Published on Oct 27

Authors:

,

,

,

,

Abstract

SimpleLoRIF uses gradient alignment to filter instruction data that silently degrades LLM safety, yielding a safer dataset that reduces adversarial success while preserving capabilities.

Fine-tuning Large Language Models (LLMs) on instruction data can quietly erode their safety, even when no training example looks harmful. Because this safety-degrading data looks benign, standard content filters struggle to catch it. We tackle this problem by developing SimpleLoRIF, a scalable gradient embedding method that identifies fine-tuning examples whose gradients align with unsafe behavior. By simplifying a low-rank attribution method and restricting backpropagation to the final four transformer blocks, SimpleLoRIF can embed datasets on the order of a million examples, boosting gradient attribution from a small-scale analysis tool into a practical filter for full post-training datasets. We first validate it on emergent misalignment, where we find that gradients can connect insecure-code training data to the broadly harmful behaviors that appear after fine-tuning, with AUC as high as 0.865 in the gradient space of misaligned models. We then use SimpleLoRIF to build SafeTulu, a version of Tulu 3 with the 20% of examples most gradient-aligned with unsafe responses removed. Training on SafeTulu reduces GCG attack success rate by up to 22% across Qwen, Llama, and Olmo, outperforming both LLM-as-a-judge and prior gradient-based filtering, while largely preserving or even improving capability. Finally, we analyzed the removed data and identify possibly under-studied sources of safety degradation, such as tool-execution failures and narrative arithmetic. We release SafeTulu along with a Hugging Face Space that lets researchers build their own customized versions of SafeTulu to fine-tune on, such as by changing the removal fraction or filtering only certain subsets.

View arXiv page View PDF Project page Add to collection

Get this paper in your agent:

hf papers read 2610.37481

Don't have the latest CLI?

curl -LsSf https://hf.co/cli/install.sh | bash

Models citing this paper 0

No model linking this paper

Cite arxiv.org/abs/2610.37481 in a model README.md to link it from this page.

Datasets citing this paper 0

No dataset linking this paper

Cite arxiv.org/abs/2610.37481 in a dataset README.md to link it from this page.

Spaces citing this paper 0

No Space linking this paper

Cite arxiv.org/abs/2610.37481 in a Space README.md to link it from this page.

Collections including this paper 0

No Collection including this paper

Add this paper to a collection to link it from this page.

Source: Hugging Face Daily Papers · huggingface.co