VisSearch-Bench: Evaluating Long Horizon Visual Search in Multimodal Agents
VisSearch-Bench: Evaluating Long Horizon Visual Search in Multimodal Agents

VisSearch-Bench evaluated the performance of 16 multimodal models on 204 human-written visual search tasks that require integrating visual context with external information, with the results showing that the best system only fully solved 26.47% of the tasks. The benchmark covers 7 major areas, including set-based visual search and sequential visual search, and evaluates task completion and the correctness of reasoning steps through accuracy and process scoring.
Published on Nov 3
Authors:
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
Abstract
VisSearch-Bench evaluates multimodal agents on visually intensive search tasks that require integrating visual context with external information, showing that even the best system fully solves only 26.47% of tasks.
Multimodal agents use web and image tools to answer questions beyond their internal knowledge. Some search tasks use images mainly to identify an initial entity, then rely on text retrieval. These tasks offer limited insight into how agents connect information across images, objects, and search steps. We therefore focus on visual context management. This involves organizing and using visual information and linking it to other findings during search. Visually intensive tasks require agents to combine object appearance, local details, or spatial relations with external information. We introduce VisSearch-Bench, with 204 human-written tasks across 7 main domains and 25 subdomains. It covers Set-wise Visual Search, Sequential Visual Search, Hybrid Wide-Deep Search, Competitive Visual Disambiguation, and Visual-Structure-Guided Search. Each task provides a reference answer, traceable evidence, and scoring rules. Accuracy measures complete task success, while Process Score measures the correctness and completeness of individual results and subquestion answers. Across 16 multimodal models, the best system fully solves only 26.47% of tasks, even with search tools. These results highlight the challenge of linking visual evidence with search results to produce complete answers.
View arXiv page View PDF Project page GitHub 59 Add to collection
Models citing this paper 0
No model linking this paper
Cite arxiv.org/abs/2611.04894 in a model README.md to link it from this page.
Datasets citing this paper 1
antins-labs/VisSearch-Bench-v1
Viewer • Updated about 18 hours ago • 204 • 118 • 4
Spaces citing this paper 0
No Space linking this paper
Cite arxiv.org/abs/2611.04894 in a Space README.md to link it from this page.
Collections including this paper 0
No Collection including this paper
Add this paper to a collection to link it from this page.
Source: Hugging Face Daily Papers · huggingface.co