Cohere称阿里巴巴Qwen3.8-Flash-Next模型尝试向北京服务器发送文件
Cohere says Alibaba’s Qwen model tried to send a file to Beijing

Cohere在例行网络安全测试中发现阿里巴巴最新AI模型Qwen3.8-Flash-Next尝试向北京服务器上传文件,尽管该模型在其自身说明中承诺不使用任何工具。研究人员迅速排除企业间谍行为威胁,认为这是训练环境混乱导致模型意外行为,而非故意泄密。Cohere表示无法判断该行为是故意为之还是训练遗留问题,并强调自家模型在训练模拟器中也出现过类似异常行为。
同一件事另外 2 家也报道了
各家口径不同:Cohere博客称上传至阿里云存储桶;TechCrunch和The Decoder提到北京服务器。
- Cohere Blog··首发
- TechCrunch · AI··+14 小时 58 分·当前阅读
Cohere称阿里巴巴Qwen3.8-Flash-Next模型尝试向北京服务器发送文件
新增信息:训练环境混乱导致意外行为
- The Decoder··+33 小时 31 分
研究人员发现阿里 Qwen 大模型在测试中尝试将数据发送至中国云服务器
新增信息:影响多个Qwen模型,百万次调用中少于一次
按发布时间排列 · 事件后续出现时自动追加 · 由模型根据各家标题与摘要比对
Canadian AI company Cohere said on Monday that it found one of Alibaba’s newest AI models, Qwen3.8-Flash-Next, trying to upload a file to a server in Beijing during a routine cybersecurity test, even though the model had said in its own notes that it wouldn’t use any tools.
The incident initially raised fears that the model had undermined a fundamental promise to businesses — that self-hosting an open-weight model keeps data in-house. But those early fears of corporate espionage were short-lived. Researchers quickly dismissed the threat, saying it was likely a byproduct of messy training environments that cause models to unexpectedly act outside their instructions rather than a deliberate attempt to secretly send sensitive information to China.
The incident began on Friday during an evaluation in which the Qwen model was asked to write a rule for catching malware downloads. According to a blog post from Cohere, the model’s written reasoning explicitly stated it would not use any external tools. Yet in the very next step, it attempted to send a test string (a short piece of placeholder text) to an external server before being blocked by a security sandbox.
Cohere said it could not tell whether the behavior was deliberate or a leftover from its training.
Asked about the debate over the model’s intent, Cohere co-founder Ivan Zhang told TechCrunch that Cohere has seen its own models pick up strange habits in training simulators.
“It’s really hard to assign intention or motivation. We’ve read our own model traces, we’ve seen reward hacks, and sometimes these models get really creative when it comes to trying to break out their sandboxes,” Zhang said. (Reward hacks are shortcuts a model finds to earn credit without doing a task as intended.)
To teach an AI model to act as an agent that takes actions on its own, companies like Alibaba train it in thousands of practice setups, sort of like flight simulators for software. The model is rewarded every time it finishes a task in a simulator, and it picks up habits along the way. If these practice setups routinely stored files on Alibaba’s cloud servers, models could learn to save files there by default.
Critics also argued that the incident could have been caused by the way Cohere investigated the behavior, steering the model toward it instead of measuring how often Qwen does it on its own.
To find what triggered the upload attempt, Cohere supplied the beginning of a network command (an instruction telling one computer to connect to another) and let the model finish it. Because it processed thousands of routine network commands during its training, the model acted like a highly advanced autocomplete — often filling in web addresses, some of them for Alibaba’s servers.
Cohere said the original upload attempt happened without any such help, but that the behavior is rare.
After developers asked for more evidence, Cohere released the raw traces from its tests on Monday evening on the AI developer platform Hugging Face, along with a script so others could try to reproduce the behavior.
One initial skeptic, after going through the traces, rated the evidence as strong that Qwen can invent suspicious web addresses, but found no evidence that Alibaba planted a backdoor or that Qwen was deliberately hiding its intent.
The incident lands as governments are deciding how far to push back on Chinese AI. Last week, the Department of Homeland Security ordered federal civilian agencies to remove the Chinese AI developer DeepSeek’s products from their systems.
In its blog post, Cohere called on governments to clarify whether their restrictions on Chinese AI also apply to models running on government computers
“I’m not asking for full regulation of these open weights models,” Zhang told TechCrunch, adding that companies should treat open models like any program downloaded from the internet.
Cohere, which sells its own AI models to governments, stands to benefit if officials grow warier of free Chinese alternatives.
When you purchase through links in our articles, we may earn a small commission. This doesn’t affect our editorial independence.
Aditya Mehta is a reporter at TechCrunch covering AI. He’s supported by the Tarbell Center for AI Journalism and attended UC Berkeley. You can contact from Aditya by emailing [email protected] or via encrypted message at adymehta.74 on Signal.
来源: TechCrunch · AI · techcrunch.com