跳到正文
实时
Hugging Face Daily Papers·· 11 天前47

ToolSpace:以工具为中心扩展长时程智能体环境合成

ToolSpace: Scaling Tool-Centric Environment Synthesis for Long-Horizon Agents

要点速览

ToolSpace 通过挖掘真实 MCP 服务和开放智能体语料库中的执行轨迹,以确定性规则而非 LLM 判断,聚类加权工具组合图形成环境,应用于 AutomationBench 和 tau3-Bench Banking 产生更难的 Pro 版本。

正文

Published on Nov 3

·

Submitted by

KABI

on Nov 4

Authors:

,

,

,

,

,

,

,

,

,

,

,

,

,

,

,

,

,

,

,

,

Abstract

ToolSpace constructs realistic multi-environment tool-use benchmarks by mining execution traces, clustering tool compositions, and validating tasks through replayable state-aware random walks.

Large language models are deployed as long-horizon agents that compose diverse tools across MCP services into executable workflows. Existing MCP environment-scaling methods are data-centric: they first synthesize a database and scenario, then derive tools and tasks from them. As a result, tool interfaces may not match real ones, tool compositions are not grounded in execution, and tasks rarely span more than one environment. We propose ToolSpace, a tool-centric framework that reverses this order. ToolSpace mines data, state, and retry dependencies from adjacent calls in execution traces of real MCP services and open agent corpora, using deterministic rules rather than LLM judgment, and clusters the resulting weighted tool-composition graph into environments. Databases are synthesized only for state-mutating environments, while query and stateless tools replay recorded returns. ToolSpace then performs state-aware random walks with rollback and decompiles each chain into a natural-language task with assertion-based checks, keeping only samples that replay successfully from the initial state. Applied to AutomationBench and tau3-Bench Banking, the pipeline produces harder Pro versions on which 7 frontier models drop by up to 38.2 points. Across seven long-horizon tool-use benchmarks, ToolSpace raises Qwen3.6-35B-A3B from 23.0 to 41.0 average score (43.2 with RL) and GLM-5.2 from 44.6 to 56.6, on par with Claude Opus 5. Ablations show that execution-witnessed edges clearly outperform LLM-judged ones, and performance keeps improving with data and environment scale.

View arXiv page View PDF Project page GitHub 7 Add to collection

Get this paper in your agent:

hf papers read 2611.05036

Don't have the latest CLI?

curl -LsSf https://hf.co/cli/install.sh | bash

Models citing this paper 0

No model linking this paper

Cite arxiv.org/abs/2611.05036 in a model README.md to link it from this page.

Datasets citing this paper 0

No dataset linking this paper

Cite arxiv.org/abs/2611.05036 in a dataset README.md to link it from this page.

Spaces citing this paper 0

No Space linking this paper

Cite arxiv.org/abs/2611.05036 in a Space README.md to link it from this page.

Collections including this paper 0

No Collection including this paper

Add this paper to a collection to link it from this page.

来源: Hugging Face Daily Papers · huggingface.co